# A process for core library fixes and improvements

**URL:** <https://discourse.elm-lang.org/t/a-process-for-core-library-fixes-and-improvements/7916>\
**Category:** Request Feedback\
**Created:** [November 15, 2021, 8:05pm UTC](https://discourse.elm-lang.org/t/a-process-for-core-library-fixes-and-improvements/7916 "2021-11-15T20:05:29Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 13

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![terezka](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex035/user_avatar/discourse.elm-lang.org/terezka/32/579_2.png) [@terezka](https://discourse.elm-lang.org/u/terezka)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2021, 6:58am UTC](https://discourse.elm-lang.org/t/a-process-for-core-library-fixes-and-improvements/7916/13 "2021-11-18T06:58:00Z")

</div>

Hi everyone!

> [have] you considered some other-than-batching maintenance model

He most definitely has, and the current strategy is a deliberate choice. Regarding delegation, then he touches upon the topic in his most recent talk [The Hard Parts of Open Source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_4EX4dPppA&t=22s). I recommend watching it if you’d like to understand his position better!

P.S. I think a fork would be great! Given that it is not the first time it has been suggested, it seems at least a few more people would be interested in exploring a more distributed governance style 😊 As already mentioned, just remember to change the name and logo!

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.elm-lang.org/t/a-process-for-core-library-fixes-and-improvements/7916)._