# A process for core library fixes and improvements

**URL:** <https://discourse.elm-lang.org/t/a-process-for-core-library-fixes-and-improvements/7916>\
**Category:** Request Feedback\
**Created:** [November 15, 2021, 8:05pm UTC](https://discourse.elm-lang.org/t/a-process-for-core-library-fixes-and-improvements/7916 "2021-11-15T20:05:29Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 17

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sebbes](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex035/user_avatar/discourse.elm-lang.org/sebbes/32/3356_2.png) [@sebbes](https://discourse.elm-lang.org/u/sebbes)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2021, 9:59am UTC](https://discourse.elm-lang.org/t/a-process-for-core-library-fixes-and-improvements/7916/17 "2021-11-18T09:59:11Z")

</div>

> Could be a path of least resistance to move this forward in the short term.

Yes and I really think it is unfortunate. One of elm’s strength is having super nice tooling and easy setup. If we start having those kind of instructions floating around (“oh just add this third party tool, setup this unofficial package”), elm will become way less friendly.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.elm-lang.org/t/a-process-for-core-library-fixes-and-improvements/7916)._