Right, I agree. If this is to be integrated into elm-test
then the published surface API should be drop-in (unless maintainers had some changes planned for a major version release which could then be snuck in as this would definitely be a major version).
I also feel like in case of publishing outside of elm-test
I’d want to create a better API from ground up since I don’t have legacy users, but … that would probably hamper migration from elm-test
fuzzers a bit. Will have to mull that over a bit