# Elm-minithesis: gathering feedback and benchmarks

**URL:** https://discourse.elm-lang.org/t/elm-minithesis-gathering-feedback-and-benchmarks/6106
**Category:** Request Feedback
**Created:** [July 30, 2020, 1:50pm UTC](https://discourse.elm-lang.org/t/elm-minithesis-gathering-feedback-and-benchmarks/6106 "2020-07-30T13:50:17Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Janiczek](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex035/user_avatar/discourse.elm-lang.org/janiczek/32/4516_2.png) [@Janiczek](https://discourse.elm-lang.org/u/Janiczek)
#### Post date: [July 31, 2020, 3:56pm UTC](https://discourse.elm-lang.org/t/elm-minithesis-gathering-feedback-and-benchmarks/6106/3 "2020-07-31T15:56:30Z")

</div>

> [@gampleman](#):
>
> I think if the idea is to get to eventually replace the fuzzers in elm-test, than having the same API would be pretty neat, as it could be a more or less drop in upgrade.

Right, I agree. If this is to be integrated into `elm-test` then the published surface API should be drop-in (unless maintainers had some changes planned for a major version release which could then be snuck in as this would definitely be a major version).

I also feel like in case of publishing outside of `elm-test` I’d want to create a better API from ground up since I don’t have legacy users, but … that would probably hamper migration from `elm-test` fuzzers a bit. Will have to mull that over a bit 🙂

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.elm-lang.org/t/elm-minithesis-gathering-feedback-and-benchmarks/6106)._