It was a good thought, but that wasn’t it.
The only odd thing about this file is the number of functions (31) without type annotations.
I’m not an expert at Git, but I’ll see what I can do about making this project available for scrutiny.
I agree. This is a misleading package name. It would benefit from following Evan’s suggested literal naming policy.
1 Like
If I import a package using the as notation
import Shots as S
and then reference functions
S.replaceShot n
… the corresponding function in the Shots module shows 0 external references when I run elm-lens
Please file a bug for this.