NoMissingTypeConstructor elm-review rule fix

Request Feedback
3

When the type constructor accepts parameters the rule checker= considers them as missing. Consider this example:

type Route 
    = Root
    | Home
    | UserDetails Int

allRoutes : Int -> List Route
allRoutes userId =
    [ Root
    , Home
    , UserDetails userId
    ]

In this example, it complaints that UserDetails constructor is not present. It would be great that it realized that there is a UserDetailts. Does it look consistent with what you want to achieve?