Proposal: Alternative Syntax for the Built-in Typeclasses

anon5324703 · March 20, 2019, 7:58am

To reiterate, I’m looking for:

A justification of the current syntax, or
Ideas about a different syntax which may conform to/deviate from mine, with justification

Cheers

Topic		Replies	Views
Proposal: Defining custom numeric types Request Feedback	15	1741	April 23, 2020
The problems with numbers in Elm Request Feedback	14	2365	May 12, 2020
Lesser known syntax Learn	17	4156	February 28, 2018
New package to use custom-types as keys in sets/dicts Show and Tell	12	1048	September 19, 2022
Proposal: remove the 'type' and 'alias' keywords Request Feedback	7	1539	August 17, 2018