# Proposal: record setters

**URL:** <https://discourse.elm-lang.org/t/proposal-record-setters/5920>\
**Category:** Request Feedback\
**Created:** [June 12, 2020, 4:49pm UTC](https://discourse.elm-lang.org/t/proposal-record-setters/5920 "2020-06-12T16:49:07Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![allanderek](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex035/user_avatar/discourse.elm-lang.org/allanderek/32/1360_2.png) [@allanderek](https://discourse.elm-lang.org/u/allanderek)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2020, 4:55pm UTC](https://discourse.elm-lang.org/t/proposal-record-setters/5920/2 "2020-06-12T16:55:19Z")

</div>

I proposed something similar almost a year ago, but it doesn’t appear there is any enthusiasm.  
[https://discourse.elm-lang.org/t/a-record-update-function-operator/4083/2](https://discourse.elm-lang.org/t/a-record-update-function-operator/4083/2)

It raised the point that the type of the `set` is unclear what would be optimal.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.elm-lang.org/t/proposal-record-setters/5920)._