I’m not sure there’s actually disagreement here! Evan’s post said:
I was on the review committee, and this is how I remember it too.
According to the numbers you looked up (really interesting to see, by the way - thanks for taking the time!) it looks like proposals would have more than doubled the number of “whatever.js” bindings in the ecosystem. That’s a lot if you ask me!
Instead of doubling, this number has decreased over time (since upon reflection, it was a mistake to accept so many in the first place - including NoRedInk/elm-rails, which I say even though I’ve worked on and used that one) and in 0.19 I expect that number to be either zero or one (for the wrapped markdown parser - I’m not sure if any of the pure Elm Markdown parsers are complete yet). I definitely consider that an improvement over the status quo!