Remove 1 record field

[rupert]

@jfine2358

There’s no reference on that page to the update pipe symbol | being used in a type definition.

It was there on an earlier version of that page and removed recently - I am guessing to avoid encouraging its use in data modelling.

add Large Records section / remove extensiblity stuff

But yes, a little annoying since it is part of the syntax.

Maybe some other syntax you didn’t yet find out about:

Lesser known syntax

Please share your knowledge of any lesser known Elm syntax that is not mentioned in the official overview (http://elm-lang.org/docs/syntax) and is possibly buried somewhere else and easy to miss. I was pleased to find out that for function parameters that are records or tuples, you do not need to choose between either destructuring that parameter OR giving a name to it as a whole. You can do both at the same time using the wrapping (… as foo) syntax! f a b c = … f a {x, y} c = … …