# Request: Elm 0.19.2: any update to help adoption to prove that Elm is not dead?

**URL:** https://discourse.elm-lang.org/t/request-elm-0-19-2-any-update-to-help-adoption-to-prove-that-elm-is-not-dead/8843
**Category:** Request Feedback
**Created:** [December 22, 2022, 6:22pm UTC](https://discourse.elm-lang.org/t/request-elm-0-19-2-any-update-to-help-adoption-to-prove-that-elm-is-not-dead/8843 "2022-12-22T18:22:58Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 29

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Laurent](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex035/user_avatar/discourse.elm-lang.org/laurent/32/2051_2.png) [@Laurent](https://discourse.elm-lang.org/u/Laurent)
#### Post date: [January 2, 2023, 7:23am UTC](https://discourse.elm-lang.org/t/request-elm-0-19-2-any-update-to-help-adoption-to-prove-that-elm-is-not-dead/8843/29 "2023-01-02T07:23:06Z")

</div>

> [@thinhtranhnvn](#):
>
> From my point of view, what Elm may really needs is to add up features like `Type Class` and declare it the version `1.0`.

It has been discussed extensively, for instance [here](https://discourse.elm-lang.org/t/wondering-about-typeclasses/7286)…

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.elm-lang.org/t/request-elm-0-19-2-any-update-to-help-adoption-to-prove-that-elm-is-not-dead/8843)._