2017 is the first time we don’t get new release of Elm. Could it be possible that we don’t get new release for 2 years or more?

maybe a stable-release-maintainer is what’s called for…

Given 0.19 and not 1.19, I wouldn’t count on it.

I can readily see how this might apply to some of the compiler issues with recursive types, but what about the thing new Elm developers raise with me: the inability to read messages in full in the debugger. That’s not much more than CSS i think?

[image] simonh1000: That’s not much more than CSS i think? The specific work to make those messages visible is a straightforward visual change, yes. But the links that Noah shared explain that releases are done in batches in order to create cohesive changes that can be communicated well. So i…

Certainly introducing features as part of cohesive releases is valuable, but I think it’s worth asking whether coupling fixes for outstanding issues to those releases (especially when the fixes could be self-contained) helps or hinders the community and ecosystem. The current organizational structu…

Even without shared maintenance, some of the most successful open source projects — e.g., SQLite which for a long time was essentially just the work of Richard Hipp — have managed to maintain a practice of rapidly releasing bug fixes for the existing official release while still developing the next …

[image] luke: So in addition to the visual update, the debugger needs to be moved to a new package to account for how program startup will work in 0.19. No, it does not need to be moved to a new package. Some bugfixes can be easily retrofitted to previous releases. I think the CSS changes for…

[image] pdamoc: like the compilation flags discovered by the people exploring the compilation time issues link please … :slight_smile:

[image] pdamoc: Since there is only one developer, 0.18 remained unmaintained. Not disputing anything you said which is all valid, but isn’t that the point of setting the version number to 0.18? I’d consider that version number to be an alpha release, beta as it gets closer to 1.0, and only f…

[image] simonh1000: link please … I lost the link. It was in #compile-time but it is lost due to message limit. The slackarchive does not have anything archived for that channel past January 15. This pull request has more information.

Will Elm Release Time Getting Longer for Every Release?

Learn

rob February 22, 2018, 9:30pm 16

There was a compile time thread here recently.

Topic		Replies	Views
Request: Elm 0.19.2: any update to help adoption to prove that Elm is not dead? Request Feedback	77	10508	February 19, 2023
Attracting Newcomers : Elm Update Frequency Concerns Request Feedback	37	3163	December 8, 2023
Updating packages Show and Tell	10	4557	September 14, 2018
A process for core library fixes and improvements Request Feedback	53	8131	December 19, 2021
When should I not use Elm in production? Learn	19	5487	August 29, 2020

Will Elm Release Time Getting Longer for Every Release?

Related topics