Just tiny opinion from Korea!
It seems like the writer of this post doesn’t content with the current Elm process. But I have different idea. In my opinion, current way is a great way to maintain Elm. I don’t want Wikipedia like system(Many people edit, so amount is huge, but quality isn’t reliable), I want Britannica like system(Fewer people edit, so amount is smaller, but quality is reliable). Of course, this way isn’t perfect match for “open source” but I hardly believe there is such a truly open source model.
And, I think Elm is the greatest language for reliable frontend coding even if there isn’t further updates for 2 years from now. Elm is already good. So, imprudently changing library implementation/adding features/adding syntax sugar will harm elm-way-clean-coding.
6 Likes