Nice builder pattern

[dta]

@rupert

example : LongOptionalRecord
example =
    builder "id-123" "Widget"
        .addParam "p1"
        .addParam "p2"
        .withAttr "env" "prod"
        .withOption "special"
        .addAndSoOn 42
        .addAndSoOn 7
        .build

Was this missing |> operators? I’m having a hard time understanding how to parse it otherwise

[rupert]

@dta

Another option is to stick each of the functions you want to qualify in a record. They can stay in the same module, but will be “namespaced”.

Yes, that is exactly what I have done - namespaced a set of functions as a record.

[rupert]

@dta

Was this missing |> operators? I’m having a hard time understanding how to parse it otherwise

Yes, my bad. Not an AI halucination so much as a human one!! I guess that code would be the “ideal” if not actually legal Elm.

[dta]

I haven’t looked back through it, but this is reminding me of this thread