I’m sure this could be done better, so just wondering how you would compare all values in two lists, returning true if all values are the same. My current solution: secret = [3,4,5,1,3,6] challenge = [3,4,5,1,3,6] List.map2 (==) secret challenge |> List.all (\c -> c == True) --> True I’d like to…

Isn’t comparing the lists directly the same? In elm repl: > secret = [3,4,5,1,3,6] [3,4,5,1,3,6] : List number > challenge = [3,4,5,1,3,6] [3,4,5,1,3,6] : List number > (secret == challenge) True : Bool > challenge = [3,4,5,1,3,5] [3,4,5,1,3,5] : List number > (secret == challenge) Fa…

Simplify list compare logic

Learn

Libbum February 18, 2019, 10:12am 3

Hah! Of course it is! Sorry, I was looking for complexity where there shouldn’t have been.

Topic		Replies	Views
New package to use custom-types as keys in sets/dicts Show and Tell	12	1206	September 19, 2022
Comparing data containing functions without crashing Show and Tell	2	645	June 7, 2020
API suggestion for dict/set in core; custom compare functions Request Feedback	21	2588	March 8, 2018
Error msg in elm repl when testing equality Learn	3	586	November 5, 2018
Introducing assoc-list, a Dict substitute with custom keys Request Feedback	6	2098	January 19, 2019

Simplify list compare logic

Related topics