I’m sure this could be done better, so just wondering how you would compare all values in two lists, returning true if all values are the same. My current solution: secret = [3,4,5,1,3,6] challenge = [3,4,5,1,3,6] List.map2 (==) secret challenge |> List.all (\c -> c == True) --> True I’d like to…

Isn’t comparing the lists directly the same? In elm repl: > secret = [3,4,5,1,3,6] [3,4,5,1,3,6] : List number > challenge = [3,4,5,1,3,6] [3,4,5,1,3,6] : List number > (secret == challenge) True : Bool > challenge = [3,4,5,1,3,5] [3,4,5,1,3,5] : List number > (secret == challenge) Fa…

Simplify list compare logic

Learn

Libbum February 18, 2019, 10:12am 3

Hah! Of course it is! Sorry, I was looking for complexity where there shouldn’t have been.

Topic		Replies	Views
Error msg does not make sense Learn	9	839	October 10, 2018
Proposal: pattern for dealing with empty lists Request Feedback	15	2798	June 30, 2019
Piping a value throught a list of functions of unknown length Learn	5	756	October 31, 2018
Splitting a list and rendering it differently Request Feedback	4	602	November 23, 2019
How to refactor this conditional piping Request Feedback	10	1423	November 21, 2019

Simplify list compare logic

Related topics