Thought experiment: Namespaced record names

I would vote for an improved nested record update.

person.pet is unambiguous to me. It refers to the value in the field pet of person.

{ person.pet | name = "Fifo"} should by the same token refer to an updated version of the record in person.pet.

If this becomes supported, { person | pet = { person.pet | name = "Fido" } } becomes valid and I don’t think it is all that hard to understand. I would take this over the proposed alternative any day of the week.

I do concede that :P has its charm. :stuck_out_tongue:

1 Like