Hello everyone,
I am very excited to announce elm-review
. If have written an announcement post here: https://jfmengels.net/announcing-elm-review/
If you happen to try it out, let me know, I would love your feedback!
Hello everyone,
I am very excited to announce elm-review
. If have written an announcement post here: https://jfmengels.net/announcing-elm-review/
If you happen to try it out, let me know, I would love your feedback!
Besides making a wonderful contribution to this community’s tools, I think your write up was very clear and complete! Thanks for putting time into all of this!
I noticed you’ve also released a package called elm-lint
. Is elm-review
a replacement for that?
Yes, exactly. elm-lint
is the old name for elm-review
. If you see elm-lint
somewhere, you can think of it being an depecated version of elm-review
.
What I recommend then is changing the readme and package description for elm-lint
to indicate that it’s deprecated and to use elm-review
instead.
Very cool, super interesting approach.
Major props for taking a stance on no built in rules. I agree with your reasoning and it is a pet peeve of mine with linters. IMO no tool should take the place of the compiler on dictating what users can do with the language by default.
Done, thank you for the suggestion!
This topic was automatically closed 10 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.